{"id":1757,"date":"2026-05-13T20:13:52","date_gmt":"2026-05-13T23:13:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/?p=1757"},"modified":"2026-05-13T20:28:15","modified_gmt":"2026-05-13T23:28:15","slug":"la-surdite-symbolique-des-tribunaux-et-letat-dexception-processuel-murillo-gutier","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/?p=1757","title":{"rendered":"Droit Processuel : La surdit\u00e9 symbolique des tribunaux et l’\u00e9tat d’exception processuel \u2013 Murillo Gutier"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

La surdit\u00e9 symbolique des tribunaux et l\u2019\u00e9tat d\u2019exception processuel<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Critique du d\u00e9cisionnisme dans le rejet syst\u00e9matique des embargos declarat\u00f3rios (Recours D\u00e9claratoires)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prof. Murillo Gutier<\/strong>
E-mail: murillo@gutier.adv.br<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

R\u00e9sum\u00e9<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Le pr\u00e9sent article examine de mani\u00e8re critique une pathologie institutionnelle du droit processuel br\u00e9silien : le rejet syst\u00e9matique des recours d\u00e9claratoires (embargos de declara\u00e7\u00e3o<\/em>) par des formules standardis\u00e9es et g\u00e9n\u00e9riques, sans examen du contenu concret du recours. Cette pratique \u2013 la jurisprudence d\u00e9fensive<\/strong> (jurisprud\u00eancia defensiva<\/em>) \u2013 vide l\u2019institution de sa fonction constitutionnelle et cr\u00e9e une divergence entre le droit formel et la pratique juridictionnelle effective.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

L\u2019analyse s\u2019appuie sur trois registres th\u00e9oriques compl\u00e9mentaires : la violence symbolique<\/strong> (Slavoj \u017di\u017eek), qui permet d\u2019identifier une surdit\u00e9 institutionnelle<\/em> en de\u00e7\u00e0 de toute agression visible ; l\u2019\u00e9tat d\u2019exception<\/strong> (Giorgio Agamben), qui d\u00e9crit la suspension de la norme processuelle sans son abrogation formelle ; et le d\u00e9cisionnisme<\/strong> (Carl Schmitt), qui \u00e9claire l\u2019attitude du juge qui d\u00e9cide a priori, sans la charge argumentative de la norme.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

L\u2019\u00e9tude examine l\u2019asym\u00e9trie cognitive<\/strong> entre l\u2019avocat et le magistrat, le sophisme de l\u2019inutilit\u00e9 de l\u2019examen int\u00e9gral, la triple violation du contradictoire<\/strong> (droit d\u2019expression, droit d\u2019influence et interdiction de la d\u00e9cision-surprise), les d\u00e9cisions-fant\u00f4mes<\/strong>, le d\u00e9cisionnisme schmittien dans la souverainet\u00e9 processuelle du juge, ainsi que les effets syst\u00e9miques de la disqualification des recours d\u00e9claratoires. Des propositions concr\u00e8tes de requalification de l\u2019institution sont formul\u00e9es en conclusion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mots-cl\u00e9s :<\/strong> recours d\u00e9claratoire \u2013 surdit\u00e9 symbolique \u2013 \u00e9tat d\u2019exception processuel \u2013 d\u00e9cisionnisme \u2013 jurisprudence d\u00e9fensive \u2013 violence symbolique \u2013 devoir de motivation \u2013 contradictoire<\/p>\n\n\n\n\tLa surdite symbolique des tribunaux - Murillo Gutier\t(2 downloads\t)\n<\/a>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

La surdit\u00e9 symbolique des tribunaux et l\u2019\u00e9tat d\u2019exception processuel Critique du d\u00e9cisionnisme dans le rejet syst\u00e9matique des embargos declarat\u00f3rios (Recours D\u00e9claratoires) Prof. Murillo GutierE-mail: murillo@gutier.adv.br R\u00e9sum\u00e9 Le pr\u00e9sent article examine de mani\u00e8re critique une pathologie institutionnelle du droit processuel br\u00e9silien : le rejet syst\u00e9matique des recours d\u00e9claratoires (embargos de declara\u00e7\u00e3o) par des formules standardis\u00e9es et … <\/p>\n

Continue lendo “Droit Processuel : La surdit\u00e9 symbolique des tribunaux et l’\u00e9tat d’exception processuel \u2013 Murillo Gutier”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"saved_in_kubio":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[615,610,603,613,429,611,616,617,593,607,516,612,609,614,599,605,602,606,608],"class_list":["post-1757","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-livros","tag-amende-processuelle","tag-asymetrie-cognitive","tag-carl-schmitt","tag-contradictoire","tag-decisionnisme","tag-decisions-fantomes","tag-droit-decoute","tag-droit-processuel","tag-embargos-de-declaracao","tag-etat-dexception-processuel","tag-giorgio-agamben","tag-iustitium","tag-jurisprudence-defensive","tag-motivation-des-decisions","tag-non-liquet","tag-recours-declaratoire","tag-slavoj-zizek","tag-surdite-symbolique","tag-violence-symbolique"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1757","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1757"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1757\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1766,"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1757\/revisions\/1766"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1757"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1757"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1757"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}