{"id":1574,"date":"2026-05-10T03:14:04","date_gmt":"2026-05-10T06:14:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/?p=1574"},"modified":"2026-05-10T03:14:30","modified_gmt":"2026-05-10T06:14:30","slug":"le-droit-penal-de-lennemi-a-la-cour-supreme-federale-bresilienne-une-analyse-critique-de-la-pratique-contemporaine-du-supreme-tribunal-federal-bresilien-murillo-gutier","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/?p=1574","title":{"rendered":"Le droit p\u00e9nal de l&#8217;ennemi \u00e0 la Cour supr\u00eame f\u00e9d\u00e9rale br\u00e9silienne : une analyse critique de la pratique contemporaine du Supr\u00eame Tribunal F\u00e9d\u00e9ral br\u00e9silien \u2013 Murillo Gutier"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\" style=\"text-align:center\"><strong>Prof. Murillo Gutier<\/strong><br>E-mail: <a href=\"mailto:murillo@gutier.adv.br\">murillo@gutier.adv.br<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\" style=\"text-align:center\"><strong>R\u00e9sum\u00e9<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-align:justify\">Le pr\u00e9sent article examine la pratique contemporaine du <strong>Supremo Tribunal Federal<\/strong> (STF) br\u00e9silien \u00e0 travers trois perspectives th\u00e9oriques : le <strong>droit p\u00e9nal de l&#8217;ennemi<\/strong> (<em>Feindstrafrecht<\/em>) de <strong>G\u00fcnther Jakobs<\/strong>, l&#8217;analyse critique de la <strong>s\u00e9lectivit\u00e9 structurelle<\/strong> du syst\u00e8me p\u00e9nal selon <strong>Eugenio Ra\u00fal Zaffaroni<\/strong>, et l&#8217;examen historico-comparatif de la <strong>dogmatique p\u00e9nale national-socialiste<\/strong>. La Partie I \u00e9tablit le point de d\u00e9part m\u00e9thodologique : un exercice de <strong>vigilance constitutionnelle<\/strong> qui ne constitue ni une hostilit\u00e9 institutionnelle envers le STF, ni une d\u00e9fense du putschisme, mais vise \u00e0 nommer les <strong>mobilisations dogmatiques<\/strong> du pouvoir p\u00e9nal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-align:justify\">Les Parties II \u00e0 V d\u00e9ploient les trois perspectives analytiques : l&#8217;<strong>architecture jakobsienne<\/strong> du <em>Feindstrafrecht<\/em> avec ses trois piliers structurels (anticipation de la punissabilit\u00e9, disproportion des peines, assouplissement proc\u00e9dural), la <strong>critique zaffaronienne<\/strong> de l&#8217;ennemi comme survivance absolutiste et la th\u00e8se de la <strong>s\u00e9lectivit\u00e9 structurelle<\/strong> tir\u00e9e d&#8217;<em>Em busca das penas perdidas<\/em>, ainsi que l&#8217;<strong>h\u00e9ritage national-socialiste<\/strong> de structures dogmatiques \u2014 <em>Volksgemeinschaft<\/em>, <em>Willensstrafrecht<\/em>, <em>gesundes Volksempfinden<\/em>, <em>T\u00e4tertyp<\/em>, <em>Volksgerichtshof<\/em> et <em>Unternehmen<\/em> \u2014 qui persistent sous des formes att\u00e9nu\u00e9es.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-align:justify\">La Partie VI applique les trois perspectives aux <strong>pr\u00e9c\u00e9dents pertinents du STF<\/strong> (INQ 4.781, ADPF 572, AP 1060, AP 2508, AP 2668), identifie <strong>sept homologies structurelles<\/strong> avec le droit p\u00e9nal national-socialiste et d\u00e9gage la diff\u00e9rence essentielle : il s&#8217;agit d&#8217;une <strong>diff\u00e9rence de degr\u00e9<\/strong>, non d&#8217;une identit\u00e9 de structure. La Partie VII r\u00e9pond aux trois questions centrales : le STF a <strong>partiellement adopt\u00e9<\/strong> le mod\u00e8le jakobsien, <strong>pleinement reproduit<\/strong> le mod\u00e8le de s\u00e9lectivit\u00e9 de Zaffaroni et <strong>mobilis\u00e9 des structures dogmatiques<\/strong> national-socialistes sans en partager le contenu axiologique. La conclusion est un exercice de stricte vigilance constitutionnelle au sens de Zaffaroni.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-align:justify\"><strong>Mots-cl\u00e9s :<\/strong> Droit p\u00e9nal de l&#8217;ennemi ; Droit p\u00e9nal du citoyen ; G\u00fcnther Jakobs ; Eugenio Ra\u00fal Zaffaroni ; S\u00e9lectivit\u00e9 structurelle ; STF ; Garantie cognitive ; Volksgemeinschaft ; Willensstrafrecht ; T\u00e4tertyp ; \u00c9tat policier ; Dogmatique p\u00e9nale national-socialiste.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n<a  data-e-Disable-Page-Transition=\"true\" class=\"download-link\" title=\"Vers\u00e3o murillo gutier\" href=\"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br?download=1573&amp;tmstv=1778412245\" rel=\"nofollow\" id=\"download-link-1573\" data-redirect=\"false\" >\n\tLe droit p\u00e9nal de l'ennemi \u00e0 la Cour supr\u00eame f\u00e9d\u00e9rale br\u00e9silienne \u2013 Murillo Gutier\t(2 downloads\t)\n<\/a>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Prof. Murillo GutierE-mail: murillo@gutier.adv.br R\u00e9sum\u00e9 Le pr\u00e9sent article examine la pratique contemporaine du Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) br\u00e9silien \u00e0 travers trois perspectives th\u00e9oriques : le droit p\u00e9nal de l&#8217;ennemi (Feindstrafrecht) de G\u00fcnther Jakobs, l&#8217;analyse critique de la s\u00e9lectivit\u00e9 structurelle du syst\u00e8me p\u00e9nal selon Eugenio Ra\u00fal Zaffaroni, et l&#8217;examen historico-comparatif de la dogmatique p\u00e9nale national-socialiste. La &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/?p=1574\" class=\"more-link\">Continue lendo<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Le droit p\u00e9nal de l&#8217;ennemi \u00e0 la Cour supr\u00eame f\u00e9d\u00e9rale br\u00e9silienne : une analyse critique de la pratique contemporaine du Supr\u00eame Tribunal F\u00e9d\u00e9ral br\u00e9silien \u2013 Murillo Gutier&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1575,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"saved_in_kubio":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[71],"tags":[540,535,536,539,527,538,526,537,146,532,530,531],"class_list":["post-1574","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-direito-constitucional","tag-dogmatique-penale-national-socialiste","tag-droit-penal-de-lennemi","tag-droit-penal-du-citoyen","tag-etat-policier","tag-eugenio-raul-zaffaroni","tag-garantie-cognitive","tag-gunther-jakobs","tag-selectivite-structurelle","tag-stf","tag-tatertyp","tag-volksgemeinschaft","tag-willensstrafrecht"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1574","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1574"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1574\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1576,"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1574\/revisions\/1576"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1575"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1574"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1574"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/murillogutier.com.br\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1574"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}